View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2008, 05:57 AM
subal krsna das subal krsna das is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
subal krsna das has a spectacular aura about
"If God created existence then he must, as a rule, be non-existent" - this is just plain nonsense. Why? And who are they anyway to say "must'?

"If a god is a necessary requirement for meaning and purpose, then that god must have another god in order for it to have meaning and purpose, ad infinitum" - this assumes that God is a fiction. Bzzt. Wrong. Fail.

"If a god is required for creation, then according to the laws of causality, that god must have a god to create it, ad infinitum" Again, very small brain evident here.

The problem is that all these arguments are coming from the position that God is fictional.

Theists say that subjective evidence shows that God is for real.

I say just accept ppl as they are. Godly? Sweet, just do waht you say you believe you should do.

Athiest? OK, you ignorant pig, stand up against that wall....

lol, just kidding
Reply With Quote