Isnt the circumstantial evidence enough to make people think that 9/11 might have been an inside job?

[TheGoose]

perhaps those theories saying there were no planes are out there to distract. yes, planes were used, but given the events in the years before and certainly after 9/11 should raise eyebrows and make people question exactly how much involvement those with the REAL power in the USA had with the event ( and i dont just mean Bush).1. defense contractors have had a windfall, corruption is rampant.2. the patriot act was ready FAR too soon afterwards. it is far too detailed a document to be drafter in 6 weeks (look at all the previous laws it amended)3. there was a push to centrilize ALL law enforcement prior to 9/11, with great opposition. but after, well, the Dept of Homeland security had NO opposition.4. if security was really an issue, why was the invasion of the southern border ignored until people started to stop fearing arabs?this isnt all that can be written, as there are hundreds of other things that make you go hmmm......i wonder how many intellegent responses i will get...

[JackBauermyHero]

Nope. I hate Bush but i'll never believe that he had anything to do with 9/11

[tx_trotter954785]

Actually, that is really weak circumstantial evidence.BTW, your question needs to be intelligent before you should expect intelligent answers.

[joker4328641]

I think the Keebler elves did it. And they plotted it with the help of the evil Rice Krispies guys. Snap hid the evidence by killing off Crackle and Pop. We can't let this stand. We have to get the truth out. Snap needs to be found and tried. The Keebler elves will be sent to Guantanamo to be water-boarded.

[Texcoach]

Here in Texas circumstantial evidence got 5 innocent men over 150 years in prison lets ask them what they think about it

[Patrick9665]

No there isn't enough CREDIBLE circumstantial evidence to realistically think 9/11 was an inside job. I usually hear this argument from people that also think Bush is so stupid he can't accomplish or do anything right. Then tell me how in the world he could have pulled off 9/11 with no one knowing about it, no reporters reporting it, no Democrats going after him for it and no credible evidence prooving the gov't did it. Gov't is far too incompetent to pull off something like this even if they wanted to and I don't believe the Bush administration has any agenda except to try to better the US in every possible way they believe they can. I'm not suggesting you agree with how they do this just the fact that his heart is in the right place.

[Pfo2257]

If the use of planes was a distraction, why go to such elaborate means? What if the planes missed? Would they call off 9/11? Why not just plant a bomb in the basement, take the towers out quick and then blame the terrorists. Remember, they tried this in 1993, so it wouldn't be far fetched. If this was an inside job, they could have done it much better.

[Derail0739]

You do know the Earth is flat, and we never landed on the moon. Paul McCartney is dead and Elvis lives. Bush planned the 911 attacks. And here's my favorite: David Icke has evidence that the world has been taken over by Lizard-men, disguised in human skin: http://www.davidicke.com/index.php/ How's that for intellegent? About the same as yours I'd say.

[phoxee2003]

In a normal society, this would have been recognized as a "job", but the powers that be have conspired to make the word "conspiracy theorist" synonymous with" nutcase". You'll notice this as comments come in. They did a damn good job!

[EdJ8167]

Unfortunately all the real evidence has been removed and can not be investigated. Quite convenient, and very interesting I might add.At a crime scene evidence should be preserved not shipped out of the country, or melted down to make a Navy vessel.