| I recommend you look into it too (as its very relevant nowadays), but here's what I'd say:
>As part of the carbon/oxygen cycle, which process would remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere?
a. the growing of rain forests
>The main source of "greenhouse" gasses is..
c. burning of fossil fuels
>The reaction of chemical pollutants with one another in sunlight produces
e. photochemical smog
>What would happen to the nitrogen cycle if all the denitrifying bacteria were destroyed?
b. the cycle would adjust to compensate for the loss of the bacteria
e. the cycle would keep right on going
(Its basically the same answer. If nitrates were a limiting factor (not a lot of them) before, then more nitrates would mean better growth of plants. However, if the soil already had enough nitrates, they would be stored (and the same amount of nitrogen gas released).
>Why is it that the chemical that actually destroys ozone is so dangerous?
b. It can recycle and destroy ozone for a long time.
(Pretty sure of it. Its either A or B. Basically it has a very long life span).
>Researchers often say "correlation is not necessarily cause." By this they mean that two or more events which occur at the same time may not always be related. Two events occurring at the same time does not always imply that one directly causes the other. Choose the combination of global events listed below which shows that "correlation is not necessarily cause."
b. CO2 levels and ozone depletion
Hope that helped. |