history helpp . please?

[lianafatsox3]

Historians have claimed a lack of leadership contributed to the inability of the nation to overcome its divisions. this argument contends that a "blundering generations" of politicians offered solutions that resolved issues but did not deal with the real problems. look at the concerns expressed by the north and the south. and look at the proposals advanced to ease these concerns. Do you feel that the "blundering generation" theory has merit or were these deeper, fundamental questions that even the most capable leaders could not have resolved? in short, was the civil war inevitable?



please help, its ap history and i'm failinggg. only post answers if you're gonna help. and i only want ideas that i could put into a three or four paragraph essay.