|
03-15-2008, 05:14 AM
| |||
| |||
| Philosphy Debate: Internet Privacy - HELP!?
The thesis for the debate is: "There should be no claim for privacy on the internet." I am an opponent in the debate and need to apply ethical theories to reject the premises of the proponents. The only things I can think to use are a Utilitarian Perspective (Compare the harms and benefits of an action to determine wheter or not the action is morally right or wrong.) and a Kantian Perspective (Never treat people as a means to an end, but as an end in themselves.) Can anyone think of anything else I can use? Thanks. A spelling error in the title, how nice.      |
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is the medicine v quackery debate almost as nasty as the atheism v religion debate? | Jack the Mack | Medicine | 0 | 03-25-2008 12:38 PM |
| Hey, I am writting a paper about invasion of privacy on the Internet. Im in need of | Philip P | Internet | 0 | 03-16-2008 12:20 AM |
| Everyone knows you never have total privacy on the Internet. But just how... | Antidisestablishmentarian | Internet | 0 | 03-05-2008 12:52 AM |
| Question about english paper on internet privacy? | jeanlenoir | Internet | 0 | 02-28-2008 08:32 PM |
| Can I watch tonights Dem. Presidential debate live on the INTERNET? | sman017 | Internet | 0 | 02-27-2008 04:22 AM |
Linear Mode
