Divorce, Child support B.S.?

[nano]

Just reading an article on Paul McCartney's case... And I thought this bullshit only happened in the U.S....

"The lump sum of ...($33 million) is made up of a sum of ... ($28 million) as the capitalized figure for the wife’s income needs, which the judge assessed at ... ($1.2 million) per annum, and a sum of ... ($5 million) for the wife to buy a property in London."

First off, why in the hell does she need 1.2 million dollars a year? She can walk...she can work...All for Heather, and the 4 yr old is getting 70k a year.... there are families doing well with 2 children on that kind of money and that's for one child alone... then he's paying for school and nanny outside of the 70k... 70k for what? food and clothes?

Why is it that divorce case judges just out there to hurt the husband's pockets, had he been richer i assure you the child support would've been more...its just a cover up to hurt the husband...

And why does she people need a 5 million dollar home???
Jemma... you don't care 'cause your on the receiving end... all you have to do is make up some heartbreaking story to tell to the judge and you're rich...

Yes... the low income dads suffer too... I think child support should be partially on the father, because if he dies all of a sudden then what? Can't assume everyone has life insurance...making her help support the child encourages her to work instead of being lazy and spending all the child support money... make her work...isn't that what women fought for? Equal rights? They wanted the same jobs, privileges as men but when they go to court and they act like they're "just women" and can't do what men can... its like being promoted from secretary to CEO, expecting the benefits of the CEO but wanting the responsibilities of a secretary, it doesn't work, you want something you have to accept the responsibilities... Agreed?