![]() |
| | |||||||
| Mathematics Mathematics |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Isn't Creationism mathematically impossible?
If you run the numbers, the chances of Creationism happening is 1 times 10 to the 1.87 bazillionth power. That is mathematically impossible. Can anyone show my mathematics that shows Creationism is even possible?Yamster, my made up numbers are cooler then your made up numbers.Actually, those numbers have been refuted to have a general lack of understanding on statistics and evolution. It is the equivilant to dealing out a shuffled deck of cards, figuring out the statistics to that particilar order, then saying it was statistically impossible that this particular order would be dealt.Turtles shows a great example of how statistics are used wrong.Also, the statistics imply that evolution needs proteins to 'randomly' get in an order. It doesn't. That is like saying water is formed by hydrogen and oxygen 'randomly' finding each other.
|
| |||
| Isn't Creationism mathematically impossible?
Ya, but you're wrong. I ran the math and it was 1 times 10 to the 1.86 bazillionth. Either way, positing an intelligent designer who is complex enough to somehow spring everything into creation, then chooses a bunch of babbling illiterate desert wanderers as his "people" then disappears without a trace with no evidence of any "miracle" ever once being verified in the history of mankind.....is mindbogglingly improbable.Add on top of that the character flaws, desperation, and breathtaking ignorance of the followers of said "god" and it is a closed case.
|
| |||
| Isn't Creationism mathematically impossible?
The anthropic principle states that were the weak force, strong force, electromagnetism or gravity of any different value, the universe would explode or implode. The probability of that just being coincidental? It lends itself again to the argument of design. And it was them mathematically precise quantum physicists who proposed this. So, yea, kind of possible.And this one doesn't refute evolution, it supports it. It's stating that God foresaw that all of this would happen and just set it off to motion to begin with.I'm not saying whether it's worth it to believe this or not, but it's coming from some of the most reputable scientists in the field right now (most of whom are atheists), and you did ask for a counterargument.S'all I'm sayin.
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|