The media shows bias against Senator Clinton. Do you think it's because of sexism?

[as-i-c-it]

It's been shown there is media bias against her:
http://www.cmpa.com/
Do you think it's due in part to sexism, and if so, why?

[End the 2-Party Duopoly]

not at all. They do not show bias against her, but if they did, it would be because they know how corrupt she and Bill are and how they used the IRS to harass and investigate detractors in the media during Bill's reign. If the mainstream media was biased against her, they would ignore her or only mention her when they smear her.

[Brad V]

No I don't believe the media bias against Clinton is sexist, I believe it stems from honest journalists drawing a line in the sand against good and evil !

[B.Kevorkian]

The media is biased against her, in part, because she's just not a terribly nice, photogenic, or entertaining person.

OK, there might be some 'sexism' in there, somewhere. Women have to walk a narrower line between being nice and being mean than men in the same position do. When a man in a position of power shows just a little hint of weakness, it can be taken as 'humanizing,' when a woman in the same position does, it's just weakness. When a man becomes strident, it shows conviction or strength, a woman in the same circumstances is being bitchy.

When a woman acts like a man, or vice versa, it doesn't just go against a modern stereotype, it goes against 200,000 thousand years of subtle but real differences between the sexes.

The trick is that, unlike the arbitrary 'races,' there really /are/ actual differences between men and women.