|
Generally, to refute an argument, use the "reductio ad absurdum" method: that is, start by assuming the other person's argument IS true, then point out examples that disprove their point or show how ridiculous it is.
For instance: children under the age of sexual maturity by definition don't have a sex drive. OK, how are THEY driven by it then? If they are not, that tends to disprove the point. Again, elderly people who have reached an age where they do not have significant libido. You can argue that though at whatever age the sex drive goes, it may be gone, but that they are still driven by social cues that are centered around sexual behavior: for instance, gentlemanly acts such as opening a door for a woman, etc. But that does little to support the assertion that such individuals are "driven or influenced by the sex drive."
Anyway, construct your argument along those lines, and similar.
good luck!
|