Unborn children described as a woman's "dividing cells"?? Isn't biology being taught

[Mrs T]

anymore? I have heard many people describing a human fetus as part of a woman's body and therefore subject to that woman's privacy. What kind of education is this where we don't understand what belongs to our own body and what does not?

A human fetus contains its own DNA, not the mother's. Therefore it is its own entity. It is NOT a piece of mucous or waste, that contains a copy of the mother's own DNA. How can anyone who has ever taken fourth grade science rationally describe a fetus as part of its mothers body? The mother is just a receptacle that holds the child, they are not one and the same.
Shady, of course , I know where the fetus gets its DNA. My point is that it does not contain an exact copy of the mother's DNA. It is not a clone.

[shadyexpert]

Actually, just to correct you, the fetus inherits the DNA from the mother and the father.

But i do agree, i dont know if people in real life actually believe that but on Y/A i do see a lot of people who dont know alot within biology and often get it wrong, the thing that annoys me is that they give really bad advice which is incorrect and they get best answer, and the questioner goes away thinking the wrong information is right when it isnt.

[avidlyalive]

people who love to excuse their own bad behaviour choices as "rights" are the ones teaching these days.